Monday, November 21, 2011

Conveniently Blind

What are the chances that two tiny lifeboats, in the middle of the ocean, each with a blind man in control, would meet? You might say the odds are pretty low, and you would be right. However,  in Life of Pi, the author creates this very scenario.  It seems so unbelievable that it must be symbolism. When Pi encounters the blind man, it symbolizes guilt.

When Pi first meets up with the blind man, he believes he is talking to Richard Parker. so he asks him, "I'm curious, tell me - have you ever killed a man?" After talking a bit, the voice, whoever it is, answers the question with a yes. He says he has killed "a man and a woman", and later saying "the man first the woman second." Well, the end of the book Pi tells a short version without the animals, where the cook killed the sailor and Pi's mom. That's a man and a woman, so this leads me to believe he is talking to the cook.

But Pi killed the cook, as seen when he confesses: "Then we fought and I killed him." It's plain and simple; the cook died. So how is Pi talking to the cook if he is dead? Remember that Pi is blind. So he doesn't actually see the other man, who is blind as well. It sure is convenient to go blind, right? Well, that could be symbolism, too. Your eyes symbolize your soul, so Pi going blind could symbolize that he had some regret or guilt that he thought was troubling his soul. Maybe the blind man was blind too because he was feeling guilt. Although when Pi asks him "Any regrets?" he answers with "It was them or me", and tries to close the subject. I think the blind man (or Pi himself) really was regretful about what he had done, and just tried not to show it.

I don't think the blind man was real; it was just Pi's imagination, his guilt for killing the cook. The blind man tries to kill Pi, which would have been Pi being overcome by guilt. But Richard Parker kills the blind man, which could be Pi's survival instinct kicking in. The point is, the blind man was symbolizing Pi's guilt for killing the cook.

Monday, November 7, 2011

Life of Pi response

Author's Note: We had to respond to what we thought this meant: "The idea of a religious boy in a lifeboat with a wild animal struck me as a perfect metaphor for the human condition. Humans aspire to really high things, right, like religion, justice, democracy. At the same time, we're rooted in our human, animal condition. And so, all of those brought together in a lifeboat struck me as being... as a perfect metaphor." It's the author talking about his book. So here is what I thought.

I think that what Yann Martel meant was that it his story symbolized humans. What I think he meant that humans are always worrying and thinking about things that are really out of our control and humans worry about things that we really can't change. We're constantly thinking about religion and justice like the author said. But really we're just animals trying to survive.